From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, g(dot)vanluffelen(at)qipc(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8573: int4range memory consumption |
Date: | 2013-11-04 14:45:22 |
Message-ID: | 11268.1383576322@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-11-02 15:29:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Attached is a proposed patch for this. It fixes most of the functions
>> in printtup.c to use a per-row memory context. (I did not bother to
>> fix debugtup(), which is used only in standalone mode. If you're doing
>> queries large enough for mem leaks to be problematic in standalone mode,
>> you're nuts.)
> FWIW, by that definition I have been nuts several time in the past -
> without much choice since I was recovering data from a corrupted cluster
> and the database couldn't be started normally. This now has gotten worse
> (even in the backbranches) since debugtup won't clean up detoasted data
> anymore.
> But I guess the solution for that is to use COPY in those situations
> which shouldn't have that problem and should work. Also, easier to parse ;)
Considering the output from debugtup goes to stdout where it will be
intermixed with prompts etc, I'd have to think that COPY is a way better
solution for dealing with bulk data.
Really I'd like to see standalone mode, in its current form, go away
completely. I had a prototype patch for allowing psql and other clients
to interface to a standalone backend. I think getting that finished would
be a way more productive use of time than improving debugtup.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-11-04 14:46:11 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8573: int4range memory consumption |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-11-04 10:12:21 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8573: int4range memory consumption |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-11-04 14:46:11 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #8573: int4range memory consumption |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-04 14:37:19 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |