| From: | James William Pye <pgsql(at)jwp(dot)name> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ/HTML standard? |
| Date: | 2005-09-10 23:22:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1126394534.2425.375.camel@localhost |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 17:12 -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > I ran accross an article a few weeks ago that suggested that this wasn't
> > all that great of an idea. Using HTML 4.01 should be just as useful.
>
> Is there a reason why the FAQ can't be in DocBook, like the rest of the
> documentation? That would allow multiple output formats to be produced,
> and avoid the need to store multiple copies of the FAQ in CVS.
Additionally, I would be inclined to think that this would be a good
idea considering that DocBook defines elements specifically for
structuring FAQ material. See
http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/qandaset.html
--
Regards, James William Pye
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-11 00:05:48 | Re: pg_restore bug on win32 |
| Previous Message | Tony Caduto | 2005-09-10 23:13:02 | pg_restore bug on win32 |