| From: | Matt Miller <mattm(at)epx(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlosreimer(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Date: | 2005-08-26 18:30:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1125081007.3660.40.camel@dbamm01-linux |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:45 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The replicator surely is not optional, and must be centralized.
>From http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/1_3/index.html:
"Several replication server can be set up. When an problem occurs at the
replication server, Cluster DB automatically changes connection to the
standing-by replication server. When all replication servers stop,
Cluster DB operates in stand-alone mode. There are two modes for
stand-alone mode: read only mode which only permits references, and read
write mode, which permits updating."
> PGCluster is query-based, right?
Yes.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt A. | 2005-08-26 19:22:27 | Altering functions cast |
| Previous Message | Cristian Prieto | 2005-08-26 18:12:57 | SPs performance... |