From: | "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: data on devel code perf dip |
Date: | 2005-08-22 02:14:30 |
Message-ID: | 1124676870.6263.6.camel@noodles |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 20:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The whole thing's pretty bizarre.
I hate to sound obvious, but does the missing performance return if you
back the patch out? It seemed to have been decided on Tue, 16 Aug 2005
15:45:30 -0700 that the performance was the same before and after.
However, there also seems to be version confusion, as maryedie(at)osdl(dot)org
also claimed to be testing a tree from the future.
Basically I think there's more confusion here than evidence. On an
admittedly smaller x86 configuration, source trees with this patch are
faster than without, not slower.
And finally, not to start a flamewar, but the initial report was on a
machine running gentoo, the distribution that should be renamed
Irreproduceable Benchmarks Linux.
-jwb
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-22 02:15:24 | Re: [pgsql-www] New web page for release status |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-22 01:56:56 | New web page for release status |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Palle Girgensohn | 2005-08-22 09:40:09 | Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-22 00:56:24 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.0.3 and Ipv6 |