Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Date: 2005-08-12 22:43:59
Message-ID: 1123886640.4879.0.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On R, 2005-08-12 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Is there any particular reason for not putting it in 8.1 ?

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Wong 2005-08-12 22:49:57 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-12 22:42:46 Re: Race conditions, race conditions!

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-08-12 22:45:03 Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-08-12 22:42:09 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends