Re: ORDER BY <field not in return list>

From: "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ORDER BY <field not in return list>
Date: 2005-07-25 22:22:54
Message-ID: 1122330174.10601.0.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 19:08 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 18:11 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> Just curious as to whether or not a warning or something should be issued
> >> in a case like:
> >>
> >> SELECT c.*
> >> FROM company c, company_summary cs
> >> WHERE c.id = cs.id
> >> AND cs.detail = 'test'
> >> ORDER BY cs.fullname;
> >
> > Seems like it should work. Is it not returning in fullname order in
> > your tests?
>
> Full name isn't a field in the results, so how would it be ORDERing based
> on it? fullname is a field in the table being joined in order to restrict
> the results to just those with cs.detail = 'test' ... but company itself
> doesn't have a field fullname ...

I'm still not seeing the problem. cs.fullname is in the product of the
join, and you can order the result thereby, and not return the column.

-jwb

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-07-25 22:25:28 Re: ORDER BY <field not in return list>
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-07-25 22:17:24 Re: ORDER BY <field not in return list>