| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| Date: | 2002-05-19 21:27:17 |
| Message-ID: | 11212.1021843637@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a small patch to ExecFunctionReScan. It was clearing
> scanstate->csstate.cstate.cs_ResultTupleSlot
> when I think it should have been clearing
> scanstate->csstate.css_ScanTupleSlot
Why do you think that? To the extent that other rescan routines are
clearing anything, they're clearing ResultTupleSlot.
> although there is no discernable (at least to me) difference either way.
My guess is that it's pretty much a no-op, since the slot will get
cleared and re-used on the next call anyway.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Burton | 2002-05-19 21:28:16 | Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-19 21:25:16 | Re: Exposed function to find table in schema search list? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-19 21:40:30 | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-19 21:22:34 | Re: [PATCHES] SRF patch (was Re: troubleshooting pointers) |