From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Windows version of PostgreSQL 8.x? |
Date: | 2005-07-12 18:00:25 |
Message-ID: | 1121191225.8208.229.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:15, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> >> How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the
> >> Linux
> >> version or should I be looking for something else?
> >
> > For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
> >
> > However, if for no other reason than the fact the the port is fairly
> > new, I wouldn't run it in production myself just yet. If you have no
> > choice but to run Windows where you are, then I'd say PostgreSQL is
> > about as stable as most other databases running on Windows.
> >
>
> Well, I have an uncle that is still using Windows NT and I don't think
> that I can persuade him to change to Linux, sadly...
> I am writing him a small app, that need a reliable database that can
> handle some data and is fast...
>
> BTW, is PGSQL 8 supported on Windows NT 4?
I believe it is. I know it works on win2k and above.
For what you're talking about doing postgresql should be fine. It's the
250,000 transaction a day monster servers i wouldn't try to put on
postgresql on windows.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Patnude | 2005-07-12 18:04:31 | Checkpoints are occurring too frequently... |
Previous Message | Greg Patnude | 2005-07-12 17:52:24 | Temp tables... |