Re: Windows version of PostgreSQL 8.x?

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows version of PostgreSQL 8.x?
Date: 2005-07-12 18:00:25
Message-ID: 1121191225.8208.229.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 12:15, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> >> How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the
> >> Linux
> >> version or should I be looking for something else?
> >
> > For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
> >
> > However, if for no other reason than the fact the the port is fairly
> > new, I wouldn't run it in production myself just yet. If you have no
> > choice but to run Windows where you are, then I'd say PostgreSQL is
> > about as stable as most other databases running on Windows.
> >
>
> Well, I have an uncle that is still using Windows NT and I don't think
> that I can persuade him to change to Linux, sadly...
> I am writing him a small app, that need a reliable database that can
> handle some data and is fast...
>
> BTW, is PGSQL 8 supported on Windows NT 4?

I believe it is. I know it works on win2k and above.

For what you're talking about doing postgresql should be fine. It's the
250,000 transaction a day monster servers i wouldn't try to put on
postgresql on windows.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Patnude 2005-07-12 18:04:31 Checkpoints are occurring too frequently...
Previous Message Greg Patnude 2005-07-12 17:52:24 Temp tables...