From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Date: | 2008-04-09 01:29:49 |
Message-ID: | 11205.1207704589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> This has been saved for the next commit-fest:
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
Er, why "saved"? Until there's a new patch submission there's not going
to be more work to do on this in the next fest.
I think maybe you need to think a bit harder about the distinction
between your TODO-items-in-waiting list and the commit fest queue.
I was willing to wade through a pile of TODO-items-in-waiting this
time, because I pressed you to make the list available before having
sorted through it; but I'm not going to be pleased to see those same
threads in the fest queue next time, unless someone's done some actual
work in between.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-09 01:36:10 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-04-09 01:28:03 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-09 01:36:10 | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-04-09 01:28:03 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |