Re: XA support

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: XA support
Date: 2005-06-29 20:52:11
Message-ID: 1120078331.8208.128.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:27, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I see option A below as the lesser of three evils. Is it reasonable
> to believe that people using XA would
> know enough to allocate enough connections ?
>
> Optionally we could have two implementations and choose between A and B

If they've used it before with jdbc, yes. It's the way Oracle does it
too. Under Jboss you have a two to one ration of backend to frontend
connections. I.e. every application connection going through an XA
connector requires TWO backend connections.

IT might be worth putting a note in the jdbc docs though.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Sidney-Woollett 2005-06-29 21:41:18 UNSUBSCRIBE
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-06-29 20:43:41 Re: XA support