| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Cave-Ayland <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>, "'Jonah H(dot) Harris'" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>, 'Pavel Stehule' <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Neil Conway' <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, 'Jan Wieck' <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, 'Denis Lussier' <denis(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger |
| Date: | 2005-06-29 12:17:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1120047454.4844.18.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On K, 2005-06-29 at 08:00 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> This is an interesting suggestion, particularly the addition of
> additional connections for management
>
> However it does require all clients rewrite (yet again ) their
> connection code.
>
> My reasoning for suggesting a separate port for debugging are:
I'm not objecting to the idea of a separate "port", just suggesting one
way to connect to that port using clients that are aware of the new PGEP
protocol.
the old ones can continue to work as they are.
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2005-06-29 12:25:52 | Re: commit_delay, siblings |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-06-29 12:03:59 | Bytecode and virtual machine |