From: | Alexandre <Xlex0x835(at)rambler(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access |
Date: | 2005-04-20 06:00:43 |
Message-ID: | 1119601e69129f64a5d083a1af72f4f4@rambler.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom, yes, something like Berkeley DB, but inside PostgreSQL... It may
sounds crazy, but some data just need not all SQL functionality and
overhead, and at the same time I need not second db, so the best
possible solution (in my opinion): two ways of the data access inside
one db.
Regards,
/Alexandre.
On Apr 19, 2005, at 22:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexandre <Xlex0x835(at)rambler(dot)ru> writes:
>> Lane, thank you, but it is not: PostISAM "generates SQL statements on
>> the fly from traditional ISAM (read, write, start) statements", so it
>> just add overhead, and is not what I'm looking for.
>
> Well, if you don't want any SQL capability at all, I think you are
> looking for something more like Berkeley DB ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexandre | 2005-04-20 06:05:53 | Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access |
Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2005-04-20 05:15:38 | Re: multibyte question |