From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres Documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on inheritance docs |
Date: | 2012-08-23 14:09:57 |
Message-ID: | 11191.1345730997@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Would it be worth coming up with more useful examples for table inheritance?
> 2) Would it be worth adding mention of uses of multiple table inheritance?
> 3) Would it be worth discussing how to position the limitations of
> table inheritance? I personally recognize the difficulties in
> documenting these but I can't help thinking that a simple chart of
> "this is/is not inherited" would be very useful as well.
All of those sound sane to me at this level of detail, and in particular
I agree that the docs are short on examples of multiple inheritance.
The arguments will probably start once you get more concrete ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2012-08-23 16:06:35 | Re: Thoughts on inheritance docs |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2012-08-23 06:40:42 | Thoughts on inheritance docs |