Re: mirroring oracle database in pgsql

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Edward Peschko <esp5(at)pge(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mirroring oracle database in pgsql
Date: 2005-06-13 15:14:35
Message-ID: 1118675675.3382.30.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:52, Edward Peschko wrote:
> hey all,
>
>
> I'm trying to convince some people here to adopt either mysql or postgresql
> as a relational database here.. However, we can't start from a clean slate;
> we have a very mature oracle database that applications point to right now,
> and so we need a migration path. I went to the mysql folks, and it looks
> like its going to be quite a while before mysql is up to the task, so I
> thought I'd try pgsql.

If you've been using Oracle, PostgreSQL is likely to be a much better
fit. MySQL's tendency to silently do stupid things (create a table as
innodb, but spell it innobd, it will make an isam table and not tell
you. insert data, roll back, find out that you can't roll back, the
list goes on and on.) and lack of features you likely take for granted
in Oracle will likely make Postgresql the better fit.

You might want to look at either CJDBC or Daffodil for what you're
thinking of. I'm not sure how well they'll work in a mixed environment,
but they seem to be the leaders in client side clustering.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2005-06-13 15:22:02 Re: duplicate key violates unique constraint
Previous Message marcelo Cortez 2005-06-13 14:50:22 invalid message length

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-06-13 16:51:30 Re: creating WITH HOLD cursors using SPI
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2005-06-13 14:09:40 Re: creating WITH HOLD cursors using SPI