Re: pg_regress.sh overrides PGPORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_regress.sh overrides PGPORT
Date: 2001-12-05 11:32:45
Message-ID: 11181.1007551965@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Does anybody know why test/regress/pg_regress.sh overrides --port or
> PGPORT? It would be nice if we could do two distinct tests at the same
> time. But pg_regress.sh forces to use port 65432.

Well, it should surely *not* use PGPORT; that's likely to be occupied.
But a --port switch doesn't seem unreasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seung-Hyun Jeong 2001-12-05 12:49:13 about heap_insert() function
Previous Message Karel Zak 2001-12-05 09:20:12 Re: date formatting and tab-complete patch