| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ddl triggers |
| Date: | 2005-06-01 08:13:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1117613615.3844.862.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Barnali <barnali(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > I was wondering whether it will be useful to extend postgreSQL support
> > to ddl triggers.
>
> This has been proposed and rejected before ... see the archives.
Could we keep track of NOT TODO items also?
The list of ideas suggested but then rejected is growing longer and we
rely on people's memory to say what was rejected previously.
The question is where do you put this idea if you reject it? :-)
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nithin Sontineni | 2005-06-01 08:14:49 | regarding storage in postgres |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-06-01 07:29:58 | Re: Interval->day proposal |