Re: libssl issue ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Roethlisberger <peter(dot)roethlisberger(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libssl issue ?
Date: 2010-09-16 13:49:20
Message-ID: 11171.1284644960@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> On 16/09/2010 4:35 PM, Peter Roethlisberger wrote:
>> /usr/local/openssl/lib64/libssl.a: could not read symbols: Bad value

> Bad build of OpenSSL? What does:

Well, the real question here is why it's not picking up a shared-library
version of libssl instead. By and large you don't want libpq linking
to a static version of openssl, so even if this configuration worked
it wouldn't be a good thing to do.

I'd get rid of the /usr/local version of openssl and use the
distro-provided one instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Louis-David Mitterrand 2010-09-16 13:49:47 "EXECUTE ... into var" doesn't set FOUND: bug or feature?
Previous Message Sam Mason 2010-09-16 13:39:11 Re: Need magic for identifieing double adresses