From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, jason(at)sourcelabs(dot)com, Sergey Ten <sergey(at)sourcelabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL99 hierarchical queries stalled |
Date: | 2005-05-17 07:39:47 |
Message-ID: | 1116315587.4965.18.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On T, 2005-05-17 at 00:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> >> What's the next step?
>
> > I suppose the first thing would be to look over the patches I
> > mentioned and the SQL:2003 specification, then put together a
> > preliminary patch and send it to -hackers.
...
> I seem to recall some discussion of how to do this in the past;
> have you trolled the pghackers archives?
I think that Jasons inspiration for doing it came from the the fact that
there are already now abandoned patches for doing it.
So studying/understanding the current patch, and describing and getting
feedback from pgsql-hackers should be quite a good way of gaining
insight in trickier parts of postgres.
So it will not be jumping at new problem and writing a patch, but rather
trying to get an existing patch into good shape for being accepted in
the backend.
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-05-17 10:52:54 | Re: Returning the name of a primary key |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-17 06:00:04 | Re: pgFoundry |