Re: generic options for explain

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic options for explain
Date: 2009-05-24 20:59:11
Message-ID: 11160.1243198751@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> You know about SET LOCAL, no? I don't think this argument is very
>> convincing.

> I completely fail to see how that helps me.

Mainly, what it does is avoid having to know exactly what the old
setting was.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2009-05-24 21:19:50 Re: pg_class and enum types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-05-24 20:58:08 Re: pg_class and enum types