From: | "Mark Borins" <mark(dot)borins(at)rigadev(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Richard Huxton'" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Disabling Triggers |
Date: | 2005-05-11 16:12:34 |
Message-ID: | 111582795401@smtp-1.vancouver.ipapp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
That looks like a good solution.
And that way it won't cascade.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Richard Huxton
Sent: May 11, 2005 11:53 AM
To: Mark Borins
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Disabling Triggers
Mark Borins wrote:
> I am creating a system where I have a trigger on three different tables.
> There is a particular Boolean field in each of these tables that when it
is
> set in table it should be set the same in the other two.
Just make sure you only check the boolean value too:
-- Trigger on table a does:
IF NEW.my_bool=OLD.my_bool THEN
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
UPDATE b SET my_bool=NEW.my_bool
WHERE id=NEW.something AND my_bool <> NEW.my_bool
UPDATE c SET my_bool=NEW.my_bool
WHERE id=NEW.something AND my_bool <> NEW.my_bool
-- End code
That way, you always do the minimal amount of work anyway.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2005-05-11 16:16:19 | Re: Disabling Triggers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-11 16:07:43 | Re: JOIN on set of rows? |