Re: Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)

From: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
Date: 2005-05-10 16:21:45
Message-ID: 1115742105.6888.87.camel@home
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> > It would seem that the planner does not take into account whether the
> > datatypes involved have the capability to use hash aggregates or not.
>
> > sdb=# explain select query_start, current_query from pg_locks join stat_activity on pid = procpid where granted = true and transaction in (select transaction from pg_locks where granted = false);
> > ERROR: could not find hash function for hash operator 716373
>
> What's stat_activity? I thought you meant pg_stat_activity, but that
> works fine here.

Oh, stat_activity is a view which removes idle connections from
displaying and allows non-privileged users to see everything that's
going on within the DB.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION stat_activity()
RETURNS setof pg_stat_activity
SECURITY DEFINER
AS 'select * from pg_stat_activity; '
language sql;

CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW stat_activity AS
SELECT stat_activity.procpid, stat_activity.usename,
stat_activity.query_start::timestamp(0) without time zone AS
query_start, stat_activity.current_query
FROM stat_activity()
WHERE stat_activity.current_query <> '<IDLE>'::text;

--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-10 16:50:26 Re: Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-10 16:11:05 Re: Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)