Re: postgresql replication

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql replication
Date: 2005-05-05 14:52:31
Message-ID: 1115304751.3868.35.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:06, Vlad wrote:
> the number one aim at the moment is to have "always-up-to-date" copy
> of our main DB with minial performance impact on replication

Have you considered point in time recovery as implemented in 8.0?

While it does require some small amount of work to bring the secondary
server up to date, it's not that much, and it gives you very up to date
recoverability.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-05 15:10:06 Re: Postgres, tablespaces, and quotas
Previous Message Listas Evandro (Não use este endereço para mensagens pessoais) 2005-05-05 14:38:29 Select of a function that returns a array