[OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement

From: Tom Copeland <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>
To: Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 18:40:27
Message-ID: 1115145627.12270.5.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:26 -0400, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.
>
> I'm running MamboForge.net, and the poor thing is getting beat into
> the cold hard earth every day. We (Mambo) should really have two
> servers, at least to dedicate hardware to the database. Most of the
> servers in that class are dual Xeons as well - just as an indicator of
> what you are getting yourselves into ;-)

Of course, Mitch is running the second largest GForge site on the planet
(as far as I know).... second only to https://helixcommunity.org/.
Here's a list of them:

http://gforge.org/docman/view.php/1/52/gforge-sites.html

Yours,

Tom Copeland

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 18:40:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:37:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 18:40:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2005-05-03 18:37:14 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement