From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-04-29 12:29:32 |
Message-ID: | 1114777772.5824.12.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On N, 2005-04-28 at 20:13 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hannu,
>
> > But I too expected the discussion to take place on pgsql-hackers, not
> > some half-hidden mailinglist on pgfoundry. Or at least an announcement
> > of that mailinglist to be made on pgsql-hachers.
>
> Yeah, we should announce the mailing list. Actually, I did direct e-mail a
> bunch of people (including you) about it and invite them to the mailing list.
Probably this got lost somewhere on the way.
> For discussing potential features, though, I'm personally reluctant at this
> point to discuss major features until I and my collaborators (example,
> newsysviews) have a concrete proposal together. It's far too easy to get
> sidetracked into a discussion of minutia and politics on -hackers; by
> generating a complete draft spec (at least) on a small mailing list, it's a
> lot easier to focus on specific goals and schedules, and discussions on
> hackers around detailed proposals tend to be a lot more focused.
Maybe :) , still not convinced though. There may be some quite
fundamental things we may miss but which could be spotted by wider
audience early on.
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Harding | 2005-04-29 13:38:54 | Re: GUITools update |
Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2005-04-29 12:21:32 | Re: GUITools update |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-29 14:00:57 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Sokolov Yura | 2005-04-29 11:54:27 | PseudoPartitioning and agregates |