From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Maldonado <jmaldonado(at)webehosting(dot)biz> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Filesystem options for storing pg_data |
Date: | 2005-04-20 16:18:00 |
Message-ID: | 1114013880.20921.576.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 11:07, Joe Maldonado wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am in a position where I'm torn between using ext2 vs ext3 to keep the
> pg_data, pg_xlog, and pg_clog contents.
>
> The main concern is that switching to ext2 will not respond well to an
> improper shutdown, power loss.
>
> My question is what is the prefered filesystem to keep this data to be
> able to optimize performance and still have some fault tolerance.
Generally XFS and JFS are considered superior to ext2/3.
ext3, in my experience, isn't much slower than ext2. Plus the decreased
time required to bring up a server after a power outage is worth
something too.
Having used ext3 quite a bit, I'd say it's fairly stable and reliable,
but I have seen references here to know, possibly unfixable bugs.
I've used XFS a few years back, and there was no great gain for what we
were doing at the time, as we were CPU, not I/O bound.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tony | 2005-04-20 16:23:48 | Re: What means Postgres? |
Previous Message | Guy Rouillier | 2005-04-20 16:13:33 | Re: Data migration from oracle |