From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored |
Date: | 2005-04-18 22:26:36 |
Message-ID: | 1113863196.20921.538.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 17:09, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble with the error message from the subject. Is
> there a way to simply go on with my commands if I hit this error?
>
> One example would be when I drop a table (and it doesn't exist) I still
> want to run the following CREATE TABLE. But due to the error even the
> following valid command will fail.
> This problem is not limited to DDL. When I try to write the result sets for
> several queries to disk it's the same problem, if e.g. the first select
> reports an error (e.g. due to a typo in the column list) all subsequent
> ones will no run as well.
>
> I know that I can "fix" this state by issuing a rollback (or commit). The
> problem is, that this stuff is part of a bigger program, and I cannot
> determine whether I'm allowed to do a rollback or commit at that point.
>
> Is this a problem with the JDBC interface that I'm using, or is this a
> general Postgres problem?
>
> Is there a setting where I can control this behaviour?
>
> I'm using 8.0.2 on Windows 2000 (and XP)
You could try using rollback and save points. set savepoint before you
drop the table, and if the drop fails, issue a rollback.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2005-04-18 22:59:06 | Re: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-18 22:21:14 | Re: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until |