Re: 9.17.5. Row-wise Comparison

From: Ragnar Hafstað <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is>
To: tjo(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.17.5. Row-wise Comparison
Date: 2005-04-07 15:51:54
Message-ID: 1112889114.5742.17.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 06:44 -0700, TJ O'Donnell wrote:
> it might break in future.
>
> > if (b > 1) then true
> > else if (b = 1 and c > 2) then true
> > else if (b = 1 and c = 2 and d > 3) then true
> > else false
> Your spec sql snippet is like an OR, isn't it, instead
> of an AND as I'm reyling on?

not really.

> After PG is to spec, will the behaviour I now see change?

yes

> > "TJ O'Donnell" <tjo(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> >
> >>I've been using syntax like
> >>select a from tbl where (b,c,d) > (1,2,3)
> >> to mean
> >>select a from t where b>1 and b>2 and d>3

if b=2, c=1 and d=1 then the expression
(b,c,d) > (1,2,3)
currently evaluates to false, but according to spec,
should evaluate to true.

gnari

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Boes 2005-04-07 19:48:49 Re: DROP TYPE without error?
Previous Message TJ O'Donnell 2005-04-07 13:44:22 Re: 9.17.5. Row-wise Comparison