From: | lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Many persistant client connections |
Date: | 2005-03-31 08:52:16 |
Message-ID: | 1112259136.424bba40cf286@webmail.kwsoft.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Zitat von Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>:
> lst_hoe01(at)kwsoft(dot)de writes:
> > i would like to know if there is something like the Oracle "shared
> > server" possible with PostgreSQL. I have searched the archives but
> > have not found any real discussion regarding this.
> >
> > We have two CTI applications opening 2-3 persistant connections to
> > the address server (PostgreSQL). With 100 clients we get around 400
> > persistant connections eating up the server memory and have nothing
> > to work most of the time.
>
> Sounds like a case for looking into pgpool...
>
> <http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/>
>
> pgpool is a connection pool system implemented in C that can allow
> sharing of connections for many cases like the one you describe.
Thanks for the info. Is this the recommended way to handle many persistant
client connections or are there other opinions/possibilities?
Regards
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cris Carampa | 2005-03-31 09:33:28 | Re: standalone version of psql.exe? |
Previous Message | Cris Carampa | 2005-03-31 08:48:47 | standalone version of psql.exe? |