From: | Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Poe <spoe(at)sfnet(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Date: | 2005-03-28 22:43:14 |
Message-ID: | 1112049794.23284.29.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Have you already considered application/database tuning? Adding
indexes? shared_buffers large enough? etc.
Your database doesn't seem that large for the hardware you've already
got. I'd hate to spend $7k and end up back in the same boat. :)
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 13:04 +0000, Steve Poe wrote:
> >Steve, can we clarify that you are not currently having any performance
> >issues, you're just worried about failure? Recommendations should be based
> >on whether improving applicaiton speed is a requirement ...
>
> Josh,
>
> The priorities are: 1)improve safety/failure-prevention, 2) improve
> performance.
>
> The owner of the company wants greater performance (and, I concure to
> certain degree), but the owner's vote is only 1/7 of the managment team.
> And, the rest of the management team is not as focused on performance.
> They all agree in safety/failure-prevention.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Held | 2005-03-28 22:58:55 | JDBC best practice |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-03-28 21:36:06 | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |