Re: Bug 1500

From: Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, Lyubomir Petrov <lpetrov(at)sysmaster(dot)com>, List pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug 1500
Date: 2005-03-26 01:32:46
Message-ID: 1111800766.2388.70.camel@petra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 20:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
> > In digging around I discovered that it appears a decision was made to
> > remove to_char(interval) at the 8.1 release but I've been unable to
> > find the replacement for this functionality. This alarms me.
>
> Yeah. Karel Zak, who wrote that code, is convinced we should remove it,
> but I don't think anyone else is ...

I think I was Peter and Josh Berkus who convinced me that the code is
bed. "we should remove..." is opinion only...

http://groups-
beta.google.com/group/comp.databases.postgresql.hackers/browse_frm/thread/a43f02de8017cabb/c290bc55d5e1e6b2?q=to_char(interval)+done&rnum=1#c290bc55d5e1e6b2

--
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2005-03-26 01:53:16 Re: Bug 1500
Previous Message Karel Zak 2005-03-26 01:18:40 Re: Bug 1500