Re: Documentation access problems.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Hugh Sasse <hgs(at)dmu(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation access problems.
Date: 2007-03-23 16:01:23
Message-ID: 11116.1174665683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> It should be standard docs imo. PDF is a heck of a lot easier to read if
> you have a good PDF reader.

Just out of curiosity, what would that be? I've used both Acrobat and
Preview, and I do not like either.

(As to the original point, I'm all for fixing the "PDF accessibility
features" Hugh mentioned, but I'm afraid it may be a research project
to find out how/whether our document production tools can do that.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-23 16:06:24 Re: Crash bug in 8.2.3 on Solaris 10/Sparc
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-23 15:39:02 Re: Documentation access problems.