From: | Murray Cumming <murrayc(at)murrayc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | per-database groups? (was Discovering privileges) |
Date: | 2005-03-21 18:38:00 |
Message-ID: | 1111430281.5554.38.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 10:02 -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 08:42 -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > >
> > > You could look at pg_class.relacl,
> >
> > I can't make much sense of that so far. Ca you give any clues on how
> > that works?
>
> See "Notes" in the GRANT documentation:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-grant.html
I notice that users and groups are per-cluster rather than per-database.
Is there any way to create users and groups that are not available to
other databases on the same cluster? I would expect databases to be
completely independent, regardless of whether they are available from
the same host and port.
This seems like it should be theoretically possible - after all, you can
not even connect to postgres unless you specify a database in the
connection.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc(at)murrayc(dot)com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-03-21 21:13:39 | Re: per-database groups? (was Discovering privileges) |
Previous Message | John DeSoi | 2005-03-21 05:23:09 | Re: pg.el? |