| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nikita The Spider The Spider" <nikitathespider(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 5 minutes to pg_dump nothing |
| Date: | 2007-09-23 23:42:45 |
| Message-ID: | 11109.1190590965@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I wrote:
> "Nikita The Spider The Spider" <nikitathespider(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Thanks for your help! Given that this problem seems to be triggered by
>> a sort of edge case and the fix is non-trivial, I guess I should not
>> expect a new version of pg_dump soon?
> We might look into fixing it for 8.3, but I doubt we'd risk back-patching
> such a change to older branches.
Actually, it doesn't look that hard --- want to try the attached patch?
I couldn't measure any speed difference at all on the standard PG
regression-test database, but there are not huge numbers of objects
in that.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 7.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | yanot panara | 2007-09-24 02:43:04 | configuration question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-23 21:07:13 | Re: 5 minutes to pg_dump nothing |