Re: handlers for inline code

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm looking at creating a plperl inline code handler. I'd like to modify
> the new InlineCodeBlock structure slightly by adding a "trusted" flag
> and having the calling code in src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c fill
> it in. This will save every language handler that implements both
> trusted and untrusted variants from having to fetch the property. I
> hope that seems reasonable.

Hm, I wonder if we should just have ExecuteDoStmt keep the pin on the
syscache entry a bit longer and pass the whole tuple? Offhand I can't
see any other fields of the tuple that are likely to be wanted besides
the trusted flag, so I agree with your proposal; but I wonder if I'm
(again) not looking far enough ahead.

regards, tom lane