From: | Mike Benoit <ipso(at)snappymail(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Evgen Potemkin <eugen(dot)potemkin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries |
Date: | 2005-02-28 20:02:55 |
Message-ID: | 1109620975.15587.17.camel@ipso.snappymail.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I'm curious what kind of performance differences there would be over
using something like the nested-set model?
Would this be faster, or slower?
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:02 +0300, Evgen Potemkin wrote:
> Hi hackers!
>
> I have done initial implementation of SQL99 WITH clause (attached).
> It's now only for v7.3.4 and haven't a lot of checks and restrictions.
> It can execute only simple WITH queries like
> WITH tree AS (SELECT id,pnt,name,1::int AS level FROM t WHERE id=0
> UNION SELECT t.id,t.pnt,t.name,tree.level+1 FROM t JOIN tree ON
> tree.id=t.pnt ) SELECT * FROM tree;
> It would be great if someone with knowledge of Pg internals can make a
> kind of code review and make some advices how to better implement all
> this.
>
> Regards, Evgen.
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Mike Benoit <ipso(at)snappymail(dot)ca>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-02-28 20:08:21 | Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-28 19:51:46 | Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail |