| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes |
| Date: | 1999-05-01 19:06:48 |
| Message-ID: | 11096.925585608@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Hmm. If you can get it to work without the file, great, or you could
> just delete the file when vacuum is performed, so the next backend
> recreates the file. That would work too.
That's a good idea. I made a test database with a couple thousand
tables in it, and found that when pg_class gets that big it does take
a measurable amount of time to rebuild the index info if the relcache
init file is not there. (Looked like about a third of a second on my
machine.) Since backend startup time is a hotbutton item for some
folks, I'm not going to take out the init file code. I'll just make
VACUUM remove the file, and then the first backend start after a VACUUM
will rebuild the file with up-to-date statistics for the system indexes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 1999-05-01 19:08:14 | Just a test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-01 17:19:41 | Re: [HACKERS] patches for 6.5.0 |