Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Date: 2014-03-11 13:40:39
Message-ID: 11090.1394545239@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> It will be 12 years this year since this "temporary measure" was
>> added. I'm just wondering, is there any "complete solution" that
>> anyone had in mind yet? Or should this just be deprecated?

> I'd say +1 to remove it. That would also make it possible to get id of
> "password" authentication...

If we remove it without providing a substitute feature, people who are
using it will rightly complain.

Are you claiming there are no users, and if so, on what evidence?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-03-11 13:47:49 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2014-03-11 13:32:44 Re: db_user_namespace a "temporary measure"