Re: Unable to drop sequence due to dependency?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unable to drop sequence due to dependency?
Date: 2009-03-05 01:42:17
Message-ID: 11083.1236217337@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Glen Parker <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> writes:
> For some reason I got into my head the notion that a sequence could be
> dropped even if reference by a field default. This seems pretty silly now.

It was true once upon a time, but we have an enforcement mechanism now
to catch that. Did you find the default you needed to get rid of?
That 2604 row should be it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2009-03-05 01:50:49 Re: Unable to drop sequence due to dependency?
Previous Message Glen Parker 2009-03-05 01:18:33 Re: Unable to drop sequence due to dependency?