| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Date: | 2005-02-01 22:44:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1107297887.12465.103.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 11:24 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> How about the TID?
That wouldn't be sufficiently stable for use by client applications, I
believe: a concurrent VACUUM FULL could mean your TID no longer points
at what you think it does.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-01 22:50:26 | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-01 22:25:50 | Re: float4 regression test failed on linux parisc |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-01 22:50:26 | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-02-01 16:56:52 | Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem |