| From: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed TODO: fetch->INT8 |
| Date: | 2005-01-24 20:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1106597120.2886.770.camel@jeff |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Is there a practical use for retrieving > 2^31 records at once?
(this is a serious question, I'm not arguing that it should cause a
syntax error)
Regards,
Jeff Davis
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 14:13 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I was browsing the TODO list and I noticed the todo to bump limit/offset
> to int8. IMO, the flavors of fetch that take a numeric parameter need
> this as well.
>
> FWIW, trying to pass integer > 2^31 to fetch gives a syntax error, which
> is clearly wrong.
>
> Merlin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-01-24 20:07:20 | Re: Proposed TODO: fetch->INT8 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-01-24 19:13:25 | Proposed TODO: fetch->INT8 |