| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-01-23 23:44:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1106523879.5790.5.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Ühel kenal päeval (neljapäev, 20. jaanuar 2005, 16:00+0100), kirjutas
Hervé Piedvache:
> > Will both do what you want. Replicator is easier to setup but
> > Slony is free.
>
> No ... as I have said ... how I'll manage a database getting a table of may be
> 250 000 000 records ? I'll need incredible servers ... to get quick access or
> index reading ... no ?
>
> So what we would like to get is a pool of small servers able to make one
> virtual server ... for that is called a Cluster ... no ?
>
> I know they are not using PostgreSQL ... but how a company like Google do to
> get an incredible database in size and so quick access ?
They use lots of boxes and lots custom software to implement a very
specific kind of cluster.
> regards,
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guy Thornley | 2005-01-24 00:21:50 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2005-01-23 23:28:29 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |