From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: pl/pgsql cleanup |
Date: | 2005-01-21 01:09:41 |
Message-ID: | 1106269781.22946.260.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 15:48 +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Attached is a revised patch (no major changes, just grammar cleanup).
> While rewriting some cruft in PL/PgSQL's gram.y, I noticed that we will
> overflow a heap-allocated array if the user specifies more than 1024
> parameters to a refcursor (a demonstration .sql file is also attached).
> I think this is probably worth backpatching to 8.0 (and earlier?) --
> I've attached a quick hack of a patch that fixes the issue, although of
> course the fix for 8.1 is nicer.
I've applied the minimal fix for the buffer overrun to REL7_4_STABLE and
REL8_0_STABLE (let me know if you think it's worth backpatching
further).
I'll post a revised patch for HEAD that does the falloc() stuff soon.
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2005-01-21 03:54:17 | Re: uptime function to postmaster |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-01-21 01:09:20 | regression: pass with no default WITH OIDS |