From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL 5 comparison |
Date: | 2005-01-06 20:55:57 |
Message-ID: | 1105044957.31694.1716.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 11:53, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Ned,
>
> > That reminds me of another, related question ... can anyone comment on the
> > relationship between MySQL 5 and MaxDB (formerly SAP DB)? The talk at one
> > point was that the end result of that alliance would be a total rewrite of
> > MySQL to incorporate concepts from MaxDB, and that the new product would
> > somehow be backward compatible with both predecessors.
>
> That was the idea, yes. Personally, I don't think it's possible; that's
> probably the reason why MySQL 5.0 is two years late. I think eventually
> MySQL AB will have to come to terms with the idea that they have two seperate
> products, MySQL and MaxDB, and the two can't be made compatible.
>
I think the last theory I had heard was that they were going to make a
maxdb table type for my$ql that would be compatible with maxdb. This
much could work on it's surface (like so many things with my$ql, think
using transactions with myisam which doesnt work but doesnt toss errors)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Paul ARGUDO | 2005-01-07 09:57:15 | Re: Solutions Linux 2005 Feb 1,2,3 Paris |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-01-06 20:28:05 | Request for additional press contacts |