Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy
Date: 2001-07-10 21:36:47
Message-ID: 11046.994801007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Seriously, "indislossy" is a singularly poor name for a predicate.

Perhaps, but it fits with the existing naming conventions for Postgres
catalog columns. Unless we want to indulge in wholesale renaming of
the system's catalog columns (and break an awful lot of applications)
I'd resist any name for a pg_index column that's not of the form "indFOO".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rachit Siamwalla 2001-07-10 21:37:22 varchar vs. text
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2001-07-10 21:36:03 Re: Strange query execution time