From: | John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things |
Date: | 2004-12-20 22:09:04 |
Message-ID: | 1103580533.21957.3.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> Assuming they *all* implement it. If some don't (which will probably be
> the case) we'll be left with some broken HTML.
Not if the html is 'made' for it... missing footer should not break the
html...
<table>header</table>
<table>body</table>
<table>footer</table>
> > Hey -- what if I can convince them to donate one of their
> > appliances? We would get the google engine and we could make
> > it look any way we want and index as much as we want?
>
> If you can persuade them to do that then I would be most impressed :-)
>
> However, what problems do you have with the current search?
I was about to ask the same thing.... what seems to be the problem with
aspseek?
Plus, as Robert said,.... there is something to be said about having a
postgresql powered search engine.
... John
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-20 22:12:27 | Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-20 22:07:32 | Re: Not wanting to throw a wrench in things |