Re: pl/pgsql oddity

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Joolz <joolz(at)arbodienst-limburg(dot)nl>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql oddity
Date: 2004-12-17 03:51:00
Message-ID: 1103255460.28882.103.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 11:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think we should go ahead and do that for 8.0. I'm getting tired of
> reading reports that stem from this mistake (I think this is the third
> one in the past month ...). I can't see any real downside to accepting
> both spellings, can you?

I agree this is pretty harmless. I've applied the attached trivial patch
to HEAD.

-Neil

Attachment Content-Type Size
elseif-1.patch text/x-patch 2.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoffrey 2004-12-17 03:59:00 Re: What HW / OS is recommeded
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-12-17 03:47:24 Re: Scheduler in Postgres