From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | drdani(at)mazsola(dot)iit(dot)uni-miskolc(dot)hu, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: missing schemas from template1 |
Date: | 2004-12-16 18:05:26 |
Message-ID: | 1103220325.22049.99.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 11:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> drdani(at)mazsola(dot)iit(dot)uni-miskolc(dot)hu writes:
> > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It's difficult to believe that those aren't there, or that the database
> >> would appear to work if they were not.
>
> > The databse is not useable, so that's right.
>
> >> Are you able to do, say, "select
> >> * from pg_namespace"?
>
> > The system is closed, I have no access to it from home, so I can't try
> > it right now. The answer is surely no.
>
> If not, why are you so certain that the problem is with missing schemas
> and not something else? I would think it would be impossible to do any
> investigation at all, if the initial catalog contents are messed up that
> badly.
Maybe the hosting company is running 7.2 or something like that?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haiyan He | 2004-12-16 18:13:45 | Postgres SQL & BlueDragon ColdFusion on OS X Server |
Previous Message | ogjunk-pgjedan | 2004-12-16 18:02:46 | Re: easy one: location of the database cluster |