From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | markw(at)osdl(dot)org |
Subject: | Checkpoints occur too frequently |
Date: | 2004-12-14 22:05:36 |
Message-ID: | 1103061936.4037.3725.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Recent OSDL test reports for 8.0RC1 show that checkpoints occur too
frequently for higher settings of checkpoint_segments and
checkpoint_timeout. This is incorrect according to the manual, and the
intention of the current implementation from examining the code.
Early tests showed that checkpoints were occurring too frequently.
checkpoint_timeout was set to 600 and 1800, on two separate tests, yet
checkpoints occurred in around 6m 15s. checkpoint_segments was set to
8192 for the last test, yet checkpoints did not occur any less
frequently. The presence of manual CHECKPOINTs has been ruled out by the
test author, Mark Wong.
DEBUG1 messages showed that there is an apparent limit of 255 xlog files
per checkpoint - this cannot be just a reporting bug since the
checkpoint timings are simply not increasing as requested by the
parameter settings. Many checkpoints occur with a spread of values from
0..255, though in one run there are 18 consecutive checkpoints with
exactly 255 files. Across the whole test there were 48 checkpoints, of
which 25 checkpoints recycled exactly 255 files and all others recycled
less. This situation could occur by chance, but with an extremely low
probability, which I estimate to be of at least of the order of 1 in 1
million - even a single test result higher than 255 would disprove this,
but none are available (anyone?).
Results referred to above are shown here:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/207/db/log
checkpoint_segments is limited to the range 0..INT_MAX in the code, so
should not be limited to only 255 files, which dare I say is
suspiciously 1 bytes worth of files.
Not only is this a bug, but it limits high-end performance for those who
would wish to set those parameters higher.
Brief examination of the code reveals no explanation for this
observation, so I'm raising it for general investigation.
Happy for someone to explain how to make checkpoints occur less
frequently... (apart from don't write to the database).
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-14 23:31:24 | Re: Checkpoints occur too frequently |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-12-14 21:04:20 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1347: Bulk Import stopps after a while ( |