Re: Corrupt RTREE index

IS this same issue true for hash or GiST indexes?

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 13:49, Dann Corbit wrote:
> I suggest a warning (if there is not already one generated) on create
> index for rtree indexes so that users know that they are not fully
> supported.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 4:14 PM
> To: Greg Stark
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt RTREE index
>
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > So you don't think this case is worth doing forensics on?
>
> If the problem goes away after REINDEX then I'll write it off as missing
> WAL support. rtree is not high enough on my list of priorities to
> justify more effort :-(
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org