From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Corporate Contributors WAS: |
Date: | 2004-12-03 19:31:01 |
Message-ID: | 1102102261.2441.338.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 13:29, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>An example is Practical PostgreSQL. That book has been
> >>online since the day it hit shelves, free for anyone to use.
> >>But it isn't the same as say donating patches to ECPG or
> >>PlPerl which gets directly injected into the community.
> >>Practical PostgreSQL is a community resource, but it is
> >>not community sponsored.
> >
> >
> > On the other hand, PL/PHP is considered a "contribution" even though it is
> > hosted at CMD's site.
>
> Well that brings up another paradigm of course, which would be
> popularity. If I recall, plPHP was actually considered to be put into
> core but it can't be because it was a circular dependency.
>
> (You have to have the PHP source to make plPHP, that is not the case
> with plPerl or plPython).
>
I think (hope) eventually it will become a project up on pgfoundry,
built using the pgxs tech, living a lot like plr.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jussi Mikkola | 2004-12-03 19:37:04 | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-12-03 19:30:24 | Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-12-03 23:56:50 | Mirror.php |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-12-03 19:24:14 | Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be? |